Summary
Thomas Hobbs, a prominent philosopher, was a key figure in advocating for compatibilism by defining freedom as the ability to act according to one's will without external hindrances or causal determinism. Contrasting the belief that freedom is uncaused, compatibilism stresses the importance of acting in alignment with one's will without external coercion. Intentional agency plays a crucial role in determining moral responsibility, as it considers individuals' choices in various scenarios to distinguish between free and constrained actions.
Introduction to Compatibilism
Thomas Hobbs was the first great compatibilist who argued for compatibilism by focusing on the definition of freedom as the ability to do what one wills without external hindrances or causal determinism.
Contrastive Argument in Compatibilism
The contrastive argument in compatibilism emphasizes that freedom is not about being uncaused but about the ability to act according to one's will without external coercion. It highlights the distinction between acts that are free and those that are not based on constraints and influences.
Intentional Agency and Coercion
Intentional agency is the concept of being an agent who acts willingly and is not coerced. It explores scenarios where individuals make choices under varying levels of coercion, emphasizing the importance of intentional actions in determining moral responsibility.
Get your own AI Agent Today
Thousands of businesses worldwide are using Chaindesk Generative
AI platform.
Don't get left behind - start building your
own custom AI chatbot now!